OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

Super Bowl XXXIV Retrospective: Titans' Wasted Timeouts

In anticipation of Cardinals-Steelers, FanHouse takes a look back at some forgotten storylines from past Super Bowls.

Everyone remembers Kevin Dyson stretching out with the football from the one yard-line in a desperate attempt to tie the game in Super Bowl XXXIV as time expired. The Rams won the game, Kurt Warner won the MVP, Dick Vermeil won his only Super Bowl championship, and Vermeil "retired" for Mike Martz to take over as coach.

What many people don't consider about that game is: Why did the Titans only have one timeout on that final drive?

First of all, let me just point out that Jeff Fisher is a damn good coach, and I'm not questioning his methods during the game. This isn't a second-guessing column. It's a "what if" column. When Fisher burned his first timeout, he had no way of knowing his Titans would storm all the way back and desperately need it.

Yes, that's right. When the Titans called their first timeout of the second half, they were trailing 16-0. There were 17 seconds left in the third quarter, and they had the football on the one yard-line. Eddie George scored a touchdown on the next play.

The Titans second timeout came during a drive in which they would cut the Rams' lead to 16-13. Following a 21 yard completion from Steve McNair to Isaac Byrd, the Titans called timeout with 8:33 left in the fourth quarter. They were near mid-field.

Now, if you can get on board with neither of these timeouts really being necessary to the Titans comeback, you can also get on board with the fact that the Titans last drive would have been a bit easier. They ended up having to start at their own 12 yard-line and attempt to drive 88 yards with only one timeout and 1:54 on the clock. They incredibly made it all the way to the one yard-line, and simply ran out of time. Just for argument's sake, let's say the Titans had all three timeouts. They most certainly would have used one during the course of the drive, instead of spiking the football and wasting a down.



Having an extra timeout when the end-zone was in striking range would have made it much easier for the Titans to score a touchdown. In fact, they had been having their way with the Rams defense for the past quarter and a half, so it's not much of a leap to believe they would have tied the football game. This would have only sent to the game to overtime, but can you imagine the fallout had the Titans won the game in OT?

- Vermeil would have never won a Super Bowl. He may not have retired as coach, meaning Martz may have eventually taken another head coaching job, instead of waiting around for the old man to finally retire.

- McNair's legacy would be a lot more solid with that Super Bowl ring, especially since he heroically led the game-tying and presumably game-winning drives.

- Finally -- and this one is the most applicable to this year's Super Bowl -- the debate this week in Tampa wouldn't be about Warner's possible enshrinement in the Hall of Fame. Nope. Instead, we'd all be talking about if Warner could finally win the big game, instead of "choking again." He threw for over 400 yards and didn't turn the ball over in that game against Tennessee, but we all know how everything is put on the quarterback in NFL games, especially in the playoffs. Just ask Donovan McNabb.

I realize there are a ton of hypotheticals here, but it really goes to show how significantly one play -- a third quarter timeout, no less -- can alter history in games of this magnitude.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

NewsMakers

Super Bowl Newsmakers It nearly left him drained, but James Harrison's record-setting interception return changed the course of the the Super Bowl.

NewsMakers
loading...FanBrand.com